The Consistently Erroneous Keir Starmer: Entirely Devoid Of Morality
We didn’t have the untold Covid failures - from the spurious £37 billion Dido test and trace system to billions of pounds worth of Covid fraud written off in the blink of an eye - a tsunami of Tory sleaze, and we didn’t have ‘partygate’, or whatever you want to call Boris Johnson breaking his own rules.
Something else we didn’t have was a neutral media. Keir Starmer writes articles for tabloids like the S*n and the Daily Mail, as well as behind a paywall on the Times website.
The Sun used to mock up photos of ‘national security risk’ Corbyn as an alien, or in a dustbin, and the Daily Mail put together a disgracefully dishonest 14-page hit job on the eve of the 2017 general election.
A neutral media wouldn’t have a problem telling you that Keir Starmer’s favourability ratings are actually WORSE than Jeremy Corbyn’s were at the same stage, 2 years in, because this doesn’t fit the Corbyn equals bad and Starmer equals good poppycock narrative, still being spoon fed to the masses to this day.
We didn’t have the media because we didn’t want the media. We had to create our own media, and while we didn’t have the finances and blue ticks, we had commitment, we had a purpose, and we had hope.
And do you know what else we had?
We had a sound policy platform that was researched and costed by some of the best economical brains in the business.
Policies are many, principles are few, policies will change, but principles never do.
We had the largest political party membership in Europe with the ability to mobilise bus-loads of activists around the country at the drop of a Newsnight-edited Russian hat, because they truly believed in what the Labour Party stood for under Jeremy Corbyn.
We had a leader in Jeremy that epitomised Labour values. Whether you liked him or not, you knew what he stood for. Equality, peace, fairness, public services, community, justice, human rights, decency, and solidarity.
It has been another week of socialist suspensions in the Labour Party, notably the bizarre suspension of Merseyside Councillor, Janis Blackburne.
Did she call Keith a nugatory tinpot dictator with the charm of a faulty strimmer? Nope.
Did she mutter those forbidden words that send a shiver down the microscopic spine of the Labour right? “Free Palestine”? Again, no.
But she did retweet the former leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, and in *this* broken, soulless Labour Party, that’s up there with calling Tony Blair a discredited warmongering cu*t.
This rotten Labour Party even try to stop women from talking about claims of sexual harassment.
Not the Conservative Party, but Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.
12 women on Labour’s ruling body and national women’s committee have urged the Labour Party to apologise for attempting to use gagging orders to silence 2 women from speaking out about the sexual harassment they faced from the same ‘senior official’.
Not the Conservative Party, but Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.
Let’s be honest. If this was happening on Jeremy’s watch we would be treated to those dreadful Newsnight specials, the S*n asking on their front page something like ‘The Islington Ripper: Is Corbyn the new Peter Sutcliffe?’, and Margaret Hodge screeching for all men with the surname “Corbyn” to face immediate castration.
But this is Starmer’s shitpot of a Labour Party, they only need to deny the allegations and that’s the last you are likely to hear of it.
We didn’t have the powerful and protective arm of the establishment to guide us through the multiple crises that Starmer has faced over the past 2 years because we were the antithesis of business as usual.
I’m genuinely proud of that.
Starmer’s lurch to the right hasn’t done anything to improve the prospects of a Labour victory at the next general election, in my opinion.
They told you it was Jeremy Corbyn that was the problem, not the policies. But that was a whopping great lie.
The common sense socialist policies lasted about as long as it would take you to say “where the fuck is the Forde Report, Keith?” - despite Starmer saying the opposite during his well-funded leadership campaign back in 2020.
It is abundantly clear that Keir Starmer cannot and must not be trusted. He has already cost the Labour Party hundreds of councillors and multiple councils. Keir Starmer is a liability.
And we’re not finished yet.
You may remember the recent report from Amnesty International, in which they found Israel to be an apartheid state?
This view is also shared by the Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC) who issued a damning report that finds Israel’s treatment of Palestinians on the West Bank amounts to the crime of apartheid.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) entirely agree with Amnesty International and Harvard Law School stating Israeli occupation authorities are committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.
But you know who doesn’t agree?
The consistently erroneous Keir Starmer.
He says it’s wrong to call the apartheid state of Israel an apartheid state.
How on earth can Keir Starmer call out Putin’s invasion and occupation of Ukraine with any genuine conviction when he’s not just willing to turn a blind eye to apartheid Israel’s occupation of Palestine, but he is also willing to deny the existence of apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territories altogether?
Starmer seems to think a moral abandonment is going to be popular with voters, just because it works for the Tories. But the evidence from the local elections during the past week suggests the electorate are turning their backs on Starmer’s Labour.
For example, the ward of Everton in Liverpool saw the Labour Party vote shrink by a massive 24.6%, and elsewhere in Liverpool, the Warbreck ward vote for Labour nosedived by a staggering 31.8%.
But it wasn’t just in Liverpool. Labour also suffered a 10.7% crash in High Peak and a 6.7% loss in Whitby.
Wasn’t Keir Starmer supposed to be the great electable hope? If his Labour Party fails to make huge gains at next month’s local elections it’s game over for the hapless infiltrator.
I’ll tell you what is “wrong”, Keir Starmer.
It is wrong that you put your case for leadership to the Labour Party membership under the banner of arguing “the moral case for socialism”. Yes, Keith, you really did.
It is wrong that you put together the infamous ten pledges, that still appear on your website to this very day, because you never had any intention of honouring those pledges.
It is wrong that you held Boris Johnson’s hand throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. When the people of Britain were calling for an urgent inquiry into the Tories Covid failures, you said it wasn’t the time to ask questions. YES IT WAS.
It is wrong that you dedicated your energy to fighting the socialists in the Labour Party while gifting the Tories with a licence of impunity to wreak havoc on the British people.
It is wrong that you have disregarded basic Labour values in your quest for power, Mr Starmer, because power without principles is power not worth having. You’re a sell out, Sir.
A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both. Einsenhower, I think.
It is wrong that you cannot find a home in the Labour Party for good people like Jeremy Corbyn and Ken Loach, but you have plenty of room in your ‘broad church’ for a discredited untried war criminal like Tony Blair.
In short, Keir Starmer, you are what my Nan would’ve called a “wrong’un”.
There’s nothing wrong with being wrong when you use it as a learning opportunity. But Starmer uses it as an opportunity to double-down. He would rather not speak to you than apologise for being wrong.
Being wrong is acceptable, Mr Starmer, but staying wrong is totally unacceptable. We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are.
Keir Starmer has been in the top job for 2 years. He carries a litany of failures and betrayals that would weigh most of us down to the ground, but when you *are* an embodiment of the establishment you live by a different set of rules to the rest of us.
As you know, this broken and soulless Labour Party is dead and buried, in my humble opinion, and I have seen absolutely nothing over the last couple of years to convince me otherwise.
Thanks for reading,
Rachael
Thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts, if you want to chip in towards improving my ongoing campaign, and it would cause you *no hardship*, you can do so here:
Comments
Post a Comment